Pages

Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

29: Middle East

The Supreme Court Republicans Make America Safe for White Republicans Their decision today is dishonest and shameful .............. Until today’s decision, an assessment of whether a state violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act would begin with a simple question: Is a minority group sufficiently large and compact to form a single member district where they would have a fair chance of electing their candidate of choice? ............... Today Alito says that the Court must reject that 1982 law to avoid a clash with the 14th and 15th amendments. Rubbish. The ratifiers of those amendments engaged in race conscious legislation to protect former slaves. Everyone understood that those amendments permitted race consciousness in order to reverse America’s horrible history of slavery — which still has repercussions today. ................

It will make all our legislative bodies whiter. It will significantly diminish protection for minority voters.

............... Alito’s mission has long been to favor the white Republicans he seems to think he represents, rather than all Americans. His five Republican-appointed colleagues on the Court appear to believe the same thing.

Monday, April 20, 2026

20: Middle East

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Modi's Vast Rallies


The Spiritual Undercurrents of a Volatile World
The Middle East has for decades been the most volatile part of the world geopolitically. Tensions have been building for a long time. And now things have gone kinetic.
But this is not just geopolitics. A Chinese analyst tried to explain things in infrastructure terms. Israel is a "node," he said. That perspective is so lacking. If you only know the material, you know nothing. You cannot untangle the Middle East, if you skip the spiritual dimension.
You can achieve moral clarity. You can have the courage to act. You can have a mighty military. But that still does not change the fact that wars are messy. Wars are always messy. There is death and destruction. There are civilian casualties. There are unintended consequences, no matter how much gaming, planning, and thinking goes into it.
And it is not like the rest of the world stops just because there is a war. There are more ongoing conflicts today than at any time since the end of World War II. I think it is because the world has become multipolar since 2008, but the institutions to go with that multipolarity have not been built yet.
And then there is the political churn of a large democracy like the United States. Recently we saw the largest protests recorded in US history. And Hungary just happened. Mid-terms in the US are a foregone conclusion. The party in the White House loses. That always happens.
In the sea of war, politics, and tech news, one thing stands out. Modi's vast political rallies in India. I guess I am a people person. Politics is about people. Tech is about people.


Thursday, April 09, 2026

9: Middle East

Sunday, April 05, 2026

5: Middle East

Saturday, April 04, 2026

4: Middle East

Five Scenarios for a U.S. Ground War on Iran A vexing geography offers no clean entry point. ........... For decades, a U.S. ground invasion of Iran was treated as the outer limit of escalation, too costly to launch and too destabilizing to sustain. That assumption is now eroding. As the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran intensifies, what once seemed unthinkable has become increasingly plausible. The question is no longer simply whether a ground invasion is possible, but where it could begin and whether it could achieve strategic results. ................. At first glance, Iran’s periphery seems to offer multiple entry points, from the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman to the western borderlands. But this is the central illusion. The same geography that makes invasion conceivable also makes it strategically self-defeating. Iran’s military geography channels outside forces into a narrow set of coastal choke points, energy hubs, and border corridors that are less pathways to success than triggers of wider escalation. What appears to be a menu of options is, in reality, a map of consequences. ....................